Dejected ... Ben Creagh was disappointed with an obstruction ruling on Sunday. Source: Renee McKay / AAP
When Daniel Anderson took over as referees boss at the end of 2012 he signalled the return of commonsense to refereeing.
Is commonsense being used to rule on obstruction?
But after several questionable obstruction calls in the first three rounds, players and coaches are starting to wonder if that's already out the window.
In Thursday night's grand final rematch Cooper Cronk went over for what everyone thought was a legitimate try.
Well, everyone but the officials, who penalised the Storm for obstruction.
"He scored like two blokes or three blokes outside of where the obstruction happened," a confused Cameron Smith said after the game.
"As a player, my understanding is that if someone's obstructed and a player runs through the hole where the defender would be, that's obstruction.
Click on the video at the top of the page to make your own judgement on the obstruction calls that prevented tries for the Storm and the Dragons. Were the right calls made? Vote in our poll and leave a comment at the bottom of the page to join the debate!
"If someone's checked on the way through and a try's scored 20 metres outside him ... isn't it commonsense that it's play on?"
One of the main reasons Bill Harrigan and Stuart Raper were sacked from their roles as referees coordinators in 2012 was the absence of commonsense.
Instead of using their instincts and feel for the game, referees were relying entirely on the letter of the law.
The day he was appointed, Anderson said this would change.
"The howlers, the clangers, came from the video refs and the adjudication of tries," he said.
"Maybe that was a result of the policy. It skewed so far that people who watched the game, commonsense-wise, would say, 'I don't know how they got to that decision'.
"Maybe that wasn't a result of the person, but the rules."
To Anderson's credit the benefit of the doubt has been abolished and the video refs' box is starting to function like clockwork.
No longer are the officials in the video box trying to manufacture a decision for the attacking team, when the average fan has a clear view that a try should be waved away.
But where commonsense has returned in some areas, it has disappeared in others.
The obstruction rule is the most obvious area where the letter of the law is still being applied to the detriment of the game.
Perhaps it's a result of an over-correction - a paradigm shift in the way the obstruction rule is being interpreted in 2013 to prevent tries like the one Justin Hodges scored in the 2012 Origin decider.
Even parochial Queenslanders like Wally Lewis admitted the decision to award that try was wrong and a call to bring back the old fashioned shepherd ruling was made.
In the case of the Cronk no-try against Canterbury-Bankstown and, to a slightly lesser extent, St George Illawarra's no-try when Brett Morris went over in the corner in the Dragons' loss to Canberra, we saw examples of the Hodges effect.
In both cases the ball was grounded by players several men wider of where the obstruction was ruled to have taken place.
Speaking to the media in their post-match press conferences, Dragons coach Steve Price and Storm coach Craig Bellamy were troubled by the rulings.
"I'm not too keen to cop a fine but I think everyone saw that," Price said.
"They're big momentum changes. At the end of the day we're not good enough to overcome them at the moment."
With Price already under enormous pressure to keep his job he promised to ring Anderson during the week for clarification.
And Bellamy might do the same.
"To the interpretation, because it is a grey area and we all understand that, it is a grey area," Bellamy said.
"I suppose (the defender) got checked on his way out and the ball was on its way out, but they had more defenders than we had attackers. And I don't think he would have got there anyway.
"I know what they're saying but I don't necessarily agree with it. If that's the interpretation there's going to be a lot of tries disallowed this year."
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét